DoraPass vs DORA Register: Which DORA RoI Tool is Right for You?

If you're researching DORA Register of Information tools, you've likely come across both DoraPass and DORA Register (doraregister.io). Both are purpose-built for DORA compliance—not multi-framework platforms with DORA bolted on as an afterthought.

But which one is right for your organization?

This comparison covers pricing, features, sales process, and ideal use cases for each tool. We'll be honest about where each solution excels.

Quick Comparison

Pricing Comparison

Let's start with the numbers, since this is often the deciding factor for budget-conscious compliance teams.

DORA Register Pricing

DORA Register uses a tiered monthly pricing model based on your ICT contract count:

DoraPass Pricing

DoraPass uses simple flat-rate annual pricing:

What This Means for You

For a typical small payment institution with 15-30 ICT contracts:

• DORA Register: €2,400-€4,800/year
• DoraPass: €500/year

If you're a compliance consultant managing registers for multiple clients, the savings compound. Five client registers would cost €12,000-€24,000/year with DORA Register versus €2,500-€5,000/year with DoraPass.

Self-Service vs Demo-Required

Beyond pricing, the biggest difference is how you actually get started.

DORA Register: Demo Required

To use DORA Register, you must book a demo call. This means:

• Waiting for calendar availability
• Sitting through a sales presentation
• Potentially multiple back-and-forth emails
• Timeline: days to weeks before you can start

For enterprise software at €50,000+/year, sales calls make sense. At €2,400/year entry price, it feels like friction.

DoraPass: Self-Service Trial

DoraPass offers immediate self-service access:

• Sign up in 2 minutes
• 14-day free trial, no credit card required
• Full access to all features during trial
• Start entering data immediately

If you've already failed a DORA submission or have a deadline approaching, the ability to start immediately matters.

Feature Comparison

Both tools are DORA-specialized, so core functionality is similar. Here's how they compare:

Validation Rules

DoraPass validates against all 116 data quality rules published by the European Supervisory Authorities. DORA Register includes validation but doesn't specify the exact rule count—worth asking about if this matters to you.

Market Experience

DORA Register claims their "RoI successfully reported across 15 EU countries." They've been in market longer and have a track record with mid-market customers.

DoraPass is newer but purpose-built from the ground up using the latest ESA specifications, including learnings from the December 2024 dry run that showed 93.5% of submissions failing validation.

Who Each Tool is Best For

Choose DORA Register If:

You're a larger entity with complex ICT relationships.

• 80+ ICT contracts
• Multiple subsidiaries with interconnected reporting
• Budget of €5,000+/year for compliance tooling

You prefer vendor hand-holding.

• Want a dedicated sales contact
• Prefer demo calls and guided onboarding
• Value relationship-based support

You already use them successfully.

• If you submitted via DORA Register and passed, stick with what works

You need proven market experience.

• Their track record across 15 EU countries provides assurance
• Established processes and support infrastructure

Choose DoraPass If:

You're a small PI, EMI, or investment firm.

• Under 50 ICT contracts
• Budget-conscious (€500-1,000/year target)
• Don't need enterprise complexity

You want to start immediately.

• No time for sales calls
• Approaching a submission deadline
• Want to try before you buy

You value simplicity and value.

• Flat pricing you can budget for
• No contract count escalation
• Self-service philosophy

You're a compliance consultant.

• Managing DORA registers for multiple small clients
• Need cost-effective tooling across your portfolio
• Want to standardize on one affordable platform

Honest Pros and Cons

DoraPass

Pros:

• 5-10x cheaper than DORA Register
• Self-service trial—start in minutes
• Flat pricing regardless of contract count
• Purpose-built for small entity needs
• Full 116 ESA validation rules
• GLEIF integration for LEI verification

Cons:

• Newer to market (less track record)
• No enterprise features yet (multi-subsidiary, API)
• Self-service means no dedicated sales contact
• Smaller company (startup vs established vendor)

DORA Register

Pros:

• Established track record (15 EU countries)
• Time savings claims backed by customer experience
• Higher-touch support with demo and onboarding
• May have features for complex enterprise needs
• Polish company (EU data handling)

Cons:

• Minimum €2,400/year (5x DoraPass entry price)
• Price escalates with contract count
• Must book demo to start—no self-service trial
• Overkill for small entities with <50 contracts
• Monthly pricing creates recurring budget friction

The Price-Value Question

Let's be direct: if DORA Register costs 5x more, is it 5x better?

For large enterprises with 150+ contracts, complex reporting needs, and dedicated compliance budgets, the extra cost might be justified. You're paying for enterprise support, proven processes, and extensive market experience.

For small PIs, EMIs, and investment firms—our core audience—you're likely paying for features and support you don't need. A €500/year tool that validates your data against all 116 ESA rules and exports compliant xBRL-CSV delivers the same compliance outcome as a €2,400/year tool.

The question isn't "which tool is better?" It's "which tool is better for you?"

Migration Considerations

Already using DORA Register?

If you've built your register in DORA Register and it's working, switching may not be worth the effort. Stability matters for compliance.

Currently in Excel or evaluating options?

This is the ideal time to evaluate both tools. Try DoraPass's free trial to see if it meets your needs. If it does, you'll save €1,900+/year versus DORA Register's entry tier.

Failed your first submission?

If validation failures are your primary pain point, both tools solve this. The question is whether you want to spend €2,400+ or €500 to solve it.

FAQs

Q: Is DoraPass a direct copy of DORA Register?

A: No. Both tools solve the same problem (DORA RoI compliance) but are built independently. DoraPass was designed from the ground up for small EU financial entities who need affordable, self-service tooling—a segment DORA Register's pricing doesn't serve well.

Q: Can I export my data from DoraPass if I need to switch later?

A: Yes. You can export your full register data at any time. No vendor lock-in.

Q: Does DoraPass support all 15 ESA templates?

A: Yes. DoraPass implements the complete ESA template structure with all required fields and validation rules.

Q: Is DORA Register's higher price justified for complex entities?

A: Potentially. If you have 100+ contracts, multiple subsidiaries, and budget for €5,000+/year, DORA Register's enterprise features and established support may provide value. For simpler needs, you're likely overpaying.

Q: Why doesn't DoraPass require demos?

A: At €500/year, the economics don't support sales calls. We pass those savings to customers through lower pricing. Self-service also means you can start immediately—important when deadlines loom.

Conclusion

Both DoraPass and DORA Register are legitimate, DORA-specialized tools. The right choice depends on your organization's size, budget, and preferences.

Choose DORA Register if you're a larger entity (80+ contracts) with enterprise budget and prefer high-touch vendor relationships.

Choose DoraPass if you're a small PI, EMI, or investment firm looking for affordable, self-service DORA compliance that validates against all ESA rules without breaking your budget.

Pass your DORA RoI. First try.